Nuclear cost .. or not?

'By 2013 start' the construction of new power plants'. This was announced by Economic Development Minister Claudio Scajola to 'assembly of Confindustria. And held that 'was welcomed by industrialists and raised protests from environmentalists and Pd. Featured in newspapers commented Legambiente ('high costs, serve 25 years) and Republic emphasizes in particular the reaction of the shadow minister of Pd Realacci Hermes:' Choosing the wrong ideological '. 'L' Italy back to nuclear . The ghost of Chernobyl seems gone. The effects of anti-nuclear referendum of 1987 almost. ..

Are springing up like mushrooms articles with titles like "The nuclear power is not convenient, "" The Nuclear is old "," The nuclear hurts "and I was wondering if it was just the fashion of the day or the absolute truth. I believe in ENEL , I trust the knowledge of ENEL , is a great company in the world and certainly has experience in nuclear power both in Russia and in Spain (with participation in Endesa ) .. why should they bet on a technology dead? Everybody talks about solar .. everyone is talking about wind .. but the accounts in his pocket as a company 's enel they can do is his job!

All this is very interesting and could rise to a lot of discussions but that does not make me sleep at night thinking about how much money will be spent for the construction of such facilities. How much money in than the European average! Born and projects driven by local mafias .. prices soared .. and then I wonder: why not buy power from China !

Here's my proposal / challenge. What will it cost to China the production of power ? Obviously unless we! Then compriamocela imbattiamoci in development and not nuclear in our house with high labor and maintenance costs (compared to china of course).

Energy low cost made in china ! Here's the solution

Related posts

• What advances ¬ Spain Spa (0)
• Common Code (1)
• Wages Manager 2008 (0)
• Black Monday for bags. Dow Jones below 7000 meters (1)
• Eni and nuclear power in Italy (0)